|
|
|
Keeping fish is a varied degree of difficulty for the early fish owner, but plants seem to offer new degrees of frustration to the formula. Are plants worth it?
Elodea, cabomba, salivinia, ludwigia, vallisneria, water lettuce, and even milfoil! What do these plants all have in common? They’re all plants listed as invasive species in the U.S. More importantly, they're all aquarium plants that have likely, at one point, been disposed of only to find themselves thriving in new territories thanks to the frustration of a beginning aquascaper who was incapable of making them thrive in their fish tank. The Woes of Introductory AquascapingIt seems that there is that added frustration most aquascapers give themselves when considering a plant: certainly, they can purchase the plant for their tank for a few dollars more, but in the end they often end up with a brown pile of mush and a welling sense of frustration. Is it a scheme of sorts? To be honest, it has nothing to do with any schemes of any sort—though one may think otherwise as pet stores do have a tendency to mix emersed plants with their aquatic selection—it mostly has to do with the aquarium. This is Not Your Father's Fish TankAdmittedly, we have come a long way from the days when guppies came in only one variety and plecos were rare novelties for the most experienced and spendthrift of freshwater aquarists. The aquarium has advanced quite a bit, but the emphasis has mainly been towards fish. For example, the typical lighting system offers a pleasant fluorescent or incandescent appearance to the tank, but barely musters any light to encourage photosynthesis. Plants are usually recommended to have 2.5 watts of light per gallon, but most tanks can only provide 1 watt or even less. The fish don’t mind the poor lights. In fact, it is often encouraged to keep lights low since strong lights promote stress for certain species who often thrive in cover or are nocturnal. For the plant, however, we are barely throwing it a bone. Filtration also encourages removal of carbon dioxide (CO2) from tanks through devices that encourage disturbing water tension. Considering how many people run their tanks exclusively with fish, this is a very good thing! Too much CO2 is bad for the inhabitants, just as too much CO2 is bad for us. For plants, however, it is far from unfavorable. In fact, the filtering often encourages the more diehard planter to install their own method of putting more CO2 back into the water! Why Bother?It seems that aquascaping from the very beginning is an uphill struggle. But with that said, it is far from an impossible task for the person willing to make some changes while understanding the limits of both their tank and its residents. Keeping plants has many rewards in the end that most fishkeepers appreciate, as do their fish.
Tips Towards Aquatic Plants
The copyright of the article Frustrations in Aquascaping in Aquarium Water Gardens is owned by Donald Lee. Permission to republish Frustrations in Aquascaping in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|